HOMES Rebate Program Guide 2026

How Whole-Home Energy Savings Rebates Work — For Practitioners

HOMES (Home Owner Managing Energy Savings) is the whole-home rebate program created by the Inflation Reduction Act alongside HEAR. While HEAR pays rebates per appliance installed, HOMES pays based on total whole-home energy savings — a fundamentally different model that rewards deep retrofits rather than single-measure replacements.

HOMES is less talked about than HEAR because it's harder to administer and most states haven't launched it yet. But for practitioners who do comprehensive energy audits and deep retrofits, HOMES is where the larger rebates are. This guide covers everything you need to know to use it effectively.

Contents

  1. How HOMES Works: The Savings-Based Model
  2. HOMES Rebate Amounts
  3. Modeled vs. Measured Savings Pathways
  4. What Projects Hit the Savings Thresholds
  5. Stacking HOMES with HEAR and 25C
  6. HOMES vs. HEAR: Which to Use When
  7. Certification Requirements for HOMES
  8. State Implementation Status
  9. Practitioner HOMES Checklist

How HOMES Works: The Savings-Based Model

Under HEAR, a client gets a rebate because they installed an eligible appliance. Under HOMES, a client gets a rebate because their home uses less energy than it did before — measured in percentage reduction of whole-home energy consumption.

The program is called HOMES because the unit of analysis is the house, not the appliance. The question HOMES asks is: how much less energy does this house use after the retrofit? HEAR asks: which eligible items were installed?

This distinction matters for practitioners because:

HOMES Rebate Amounts

Tier 1: 20–35% whole-home energy savings
LMI households (<80% AMI): up to $4,000
All other households: up to $2,000
Tier 2: 35%+ whole-home energy savings
LMI households (<80% AMI): up to $8,000
All other households: up to $4,000
The 35% threshold is the target for most deep retrofits. A 35%+ reduction roughly doubles the available rebate for LMI households ($8K vs $4K) and doubles it for market-rate households ($4K vs $2K). In states with significant older housing stock — rural Appalachia, Northeast pre-1980 homes, upper Midwest oil/propane households — the 35% threshold is achievable for most comprehensive retrofits.

Per-Unit Calculation

The amounts above are maximums. Actual HOMES rebates are calculated as:

This means for HOMES to pay out at its maximum, the project cost must be at least $5,000 (for non-LMI Tier 1) up to $10,000 (for LMI Tier 2). Most comprehensive retrofits easily meet these thresholds.

Modeled vs. Measured Savings Pathways

HOMES allows two methods for calculating savings: modeled and measured. Which pathway your state uses — and which you choose — affects your workflow, timeline, and certainty of rebate payment.

Modeled Savings Pathway

  • Uses energy modeling software (BEopt, EnergyPlus, or approved equivalent) to project pre/post energy use
  • Assessment happens before installation — rebate can be pre-approved
  • Faster for clients: rebate timeline is predictable
  • Requires qualified energy modeler (typically BPI or RESNET certified)
  • Model must use approved assumptions and be submitted to the program
  • Risk: actual savings may differ from modeled; some states require post-installation verification
  • Best for: Projects where client needs upfront cost certainty; contractors without ongoing energy metering

Measured Savings Pathway

  • Uses actual pre/post utility bill data (12+ months each) to calculate real savings
  • Assessment is retrospective — client pays full cost upfront, rebate comes after savings are verified
  • More accurate — no modeling assumptions
  • Requires 12+ months of post-installation utility data before rebate is paid
  • Higher rebate ceiling in some states for verified savings exceeding thresholds
  • Requires active utility data sharing agreement in your state
  • Best for: Clients who can wait; projects where measured savings are likely to exceed modeled estimates
Most states launching HOMES are starting with the modeled pathway. The measured pathway requires utility data sharing agreements that take time to negotiate. Colorado has piloted measured savings since early 2026; most other states remain modeled-only. If your state is measured-only, you need utility data sharing infrastructure before you can run a HOMES project.

What Projects Hit the Savings Thresholds

The 20% and 35% thresholds refer to whole-home energy reduction — usually measured in source energy (total energy including generation and distribution losses) or site energy (energy consumed at the building). Confirm with your state which metric they use.

Typical Savings by Project Type

Project Typical Savings Range Notes
Heat pump HVAC replacing gas furnace 15–30% Depends heavily on base case efficiency and climate; stronger in moderate climates
Heat pump HVAC replacing oil/propane heat 25–45% Higher savings because oil/propane baseline efficiency is lower; frequently hits 35%+ threshold
Attic insulation + air sealing 10–20% Alone rarely hits 20% threshold; strong complement to HP HVAC
Full envelope (attic + walls + basement + air sealing) 20–35% Pre-1980 homes with poor envelope; can reach 35% without HVAC change
HP HVAC + attic insulation + air sealing 30–50% The classic HOMES package; reliably hits 35%+ in heating-dominated climates
Full deep retrofit (HP HVAC + envelope + HPWH + ventilation) 45–70% Maximum savings; targets Passive House-adjacent performance
Heat pump water heater only 3–8% Not enough alone for HOMES threshold; always pair with other measures
Solar PV 20–80% (generation) Solar generation may or may not count toward HOMES savings depending on state definition — verify before quoting
Cooling-dominant climates reach thresholds differently. In Florida, Texas, and similar hot-humid climates, the dominant load is cooling, not heating. Heat pump replacements of existing air conditioning save less in percentage terms because the baseline is already relatively efficient. In these states, the highest HOMES savings come from envelope improvements (reducing solar gain) and better-performing cooling equipment. Practitioners in warm climates should model carefully before promising 35%+ to clients.

The Homes That Hit 35%+ Most Reliably

Stacking HOMES with HEAR and 25C

The most common practitioner confusion: can you use both HOMES and HEAR on the same project?

Yes — with conditions. HOMES and HEAR can be applied to the same project, but they cannot cover the same costs. The rule is that any specific cost can only be covered by one program at a time.

How to Stack HOMES + HEAR Correctly

The practical approach:

  1. Scope the project to include HEAR-eligible appliances (heat pump HVAC, HPWH, panel upgrade)
  2. Apply HEAR rebates to those specific appliances at point of sale
  3. Apply HOMES rebates to the remaining eligible costs — insulation, air sealing, labor, other envelope work — that are not covered by HEAR
  4. Apply 25C credits to the net cost remaining after both HEAR and HOMES rebates

Example Stack — Deep Retrofit, Massachusetts LMI Household

Cost Item Cost Incentive Applied Net Cost
Heat pump HVAC $12,000 HEAR LMI: $8,000 $4,000
Heat pump water heater $2,800 HEAR LMI: $1,750 $1,050
Attic insulation + air sealing $5,000 HOMES LMI (whole-home 40% savings): $4,000 $1,000
Panel upgrade $3,500 HEAR LMI: $3,500 (80% of cost) $0
Totals $23,300 $6,050 before 25C
25C credits (on net HP cost) 30% × $4,000 = $1,200
Final net cost ~$4,850

On a $23,300 project, an LMI client ends up paying approximately $4,850 out of pocket — about 21% of total cost. That's what HOMES + HEAR stacking looks like in practice.

HOMES vs. HEAR: Which to Use When

Situation Recommended Program Reason
Single appliance replacement (heat pump only) HEAR HOMES requires whole-home assessment; HEAR is faster and simpler for single measures
Comprehensive retrofit in older home (pre-1980) HOMES + HEAR Stack both; HEAR covers appliances, HOMES covers envelope and remaining costs
LMI household, oil/propane to heat pump conversion HOMES + HEAR priority Likely to hit 35%+ threshold; maximum HOMES payout ($8K LMI) plus HEAR ($8K LMI) available
Market-rate household, single heat pump HEAR + 25C HOMES for market-rate is $2–4K max; not worth the assessment overhead for a single-measure job
Multifamily building HOMES (if allowed) HEAR has per-unit limits; HOMES may allow whole-building assessment depending on state rules for multifamily
State with only HEAR live HEAR only If HOMES isn't launched in your state, use HEAR for available appliances and document for HOMES when it launches

Certification Requirements for HOMES

HOMES requires a qualified energy auditor to conduct the pre/post assessment and submit the energy model or measured data to the program. This is different from HEAR, which in most states does not require the installing contractor to have energy auditing credentials.

Accepted Credentials (Varies by State)

Credential Issuer Relevance to HOMES
Building Performance Institute (BPI) Building Analyst BPI (bpi.org) Widely accepted; covers diagnostic testing (blower door, combustion safety), energy modeling
RESNET HERS Rater RESNET (resnet.us) Required in some states for modeled pathway; uses HERS Index to quantify energy performance
Certified Energy Auditor (CEA) AEE (aeecenter.org) Accepted in some states; more common in commercial context
Home Energy Professional (HEP) Auditor DOE / IREC DOE-recognized credential; relevant for federally-funded programs
Certified Energy Auditor (CEM/CEA) variants Various state programs Check your specific state's HOMES requirements for accepted credentials
Opportunity for energy auditors: HOMES creates a billing opportunity for energy auditors that doesn't exist in HEAR. An HVAC contractor can process a HEAR rebate. They cannot process a HOMES rebate without a certified auditor. If you're BPI or RESNET certified, HOMES is a program that rewards your credentials directly — and creates a reason for HVAC contractors to refer to you.

HOMES State Implementation Status

HOMES is launching alongside HEAR in most states, but some states have prioritized HEAR first. Here's the current landscape:

State HOMES Status Pathway Notes
Massachusetts Live Modeled Administered through Mass Save; HERS rater required for modeled pathway
New York Live Modeled Via NYSERDA; BPI or RESNET credential required
Maryland Live Modeled MEA administering; faster processing than most states
Colorado Live (both pathways) Modeled + Measured One of only states with measured pathway pilot running; utility data sharing agreement active
Michigan Live Modeled Via Michigan Saves; strong cold-climate deep retrofit opportunity
Illinois Live Modeled Via ComEd/Nicor partnership
Washington Live Modeled WA Dept of Commerce; Pacific Northwest older homes have good savings potential
California Open (HEAR exhausted) Modeled HOMES still accepting applications; HEAR waitlist only
Pennsylvania, Virginia, Minnesota, Ohio Pending TBD Will launch alongside HEAR when programs open
Connecticut Launching Q3 2026 TBD CT DEEP/Energize CT

Practitioner HOMES Checklist

Before Proposing HOMES to a Client

For the Assessment

For HOMES + HEAR Stacking

Get weekly HOMES and HEAR program updates

The IRA Practitioner Brief covers state launches, rule changes, and deep-retrofit strategies. Free for Issues #1–3. Paid ($29/month) starting Issue #4. Subscribers get the printable IRA Practitioner Cheat Sheet.

Related Resources